Latest L&D Playbook: The 2026 AI Buyer's Guide for HR and L&D Leaders Download Now
Login Help Careers

Absorb LMS vs Degreed

Absorb LMS is built around compliance automation and a clean user experience, whereas Degreed is built around skills reporting across content you already own. Compared below on published capability, verified ratings and pricing structure. Disprz publishes this page and is left out of the capability table below.

Data reviewed 2026-09-15 9 sources How we compared these

See the verdict Book a Disprz demo
Absorb LMS
4.6 G2, 976 reviews

Mid-market to enterprise (200 to 5,000+). Tech, healthcare, retail and multi-audience training

Quote only no public list price

Degreed
4.3 G2, 42 reviews

Positioning not verified from the vendor site.

Quote only no public list price

Disprz
4.7 Capterra, 138 reviews

Positioning not verified from the vendor site.

Quote only no public list price

Key takeaways

Absorb LMS vs Degreed in five lines

  • Ratings
    On the 3 shared sites: G2 4.6 (976 reviews) against 4.3 (42 reviews); Capterra 4.6 (360 reviews) against 4.5 (24 reviews); Gartner Peer Insights 4.6 (334 ratings) against 4.4 (34 ratings). Absorb LMS rates higher on 3 of 3. Absorb LMS carries roughly 17x the sample (1,670 against 100), so read the scores next to the counts.
  • Shape
    Both state 2 of the 12 capabilities compared. Absorb LMS states 7 that Degreed does not, including: Core LMS: courses, compliance, certification; Frontline and deskless, mobile first; Authoring inside the platform.
  • Pricing
    Neither publishes list pricing. Both are quoted on headcount, modules and region, so ask each for a three-year total including content and services.
  • Rollout
    Absorb LMS publishes no go-live figure. Degreed publishes no go-live figure.
  • The gap
    Neither states 3 of the capabilities compared, including Deep configuration; Publishes a weeks-to-live figure.

Which one fits

Pick your situation, get the honest answer

Every outcome below is also written out in text underneath, so nothing here is hidden behind the picker.

What is not working today
Who you are training
Live by

Best fit

Every outcome is written out below, so nothing is hidden behind the picker.

who you are training is Partners and customers

Absorb LMS Absorb LMS states partner and customer academies on its own site and Degreed does not.

who you are training is Frontline and deskless

Absorb LMS Absorb LMS states frontline and deskless, mobile first on its own site and Degreed does not.

who you are training is All of the above

Neither, on this one Neither is a full talent suite. If you want recruiting and performance from the same vendor, neither of these is the whole answer.

what is not working today is Completions, but no capability

Neither, on this one Both state capability reporting rather than completions, so ask each to show the same skill gap report on your own roles.

what is not working today is Cost and add-on creep

Neither, on this one Neither publishes a list price. Both are quoted on headcount and modules, so compare three-year totals including services rather than licence lines.

what is not working today is Admin burden on a small team

Neither, on this one Neither has a decisive ease-of-use advantage in the verified scores, so judge admin burden on a hands-on trial with your own team.

live by is This quarter

Neither, on this one Neither publishes a weeks-to-live figure, so treat any quarter-length promise as something to get in writing before you sign.

in general

Neither, on this one The two sit within a rounding error of each other on the verified sites, so the ratings will not decide this. The situational rows above will.

Pricing

What each one costs, and what moves the number

Neither of these is a rate card. It is how the quote is built.

Absorb LMS

Read from the Absorb LMS public pricing and product pages, September 2026.

Quoted On request
Custom quote, per-user or active-user

Custom quote, per-user or active-user (No, quote only); Guided demo

No public list price, so the only way to compare is to ask for a three-year total.
Degreed

Read from the Degreed public pricing and product pages, September 2026.

Quoted On request
Priced on headcount and modules

No pricing model was verified from the vendor site.

No public list price, so the only way to compare is to ask for a three-year total.
Disprz

Read from the Disprz public pricing and product pages, September 2026.

Quoted On request
Priced on headcount and modules

No pricing model was verified from the vendor site.

No public list price, so the only way to compare is to ask for a three-year total.
Ask all of them the same three questions: the three-year total including content and services, what becomes a separate line item later, and what happens to the price when headcount moves.

Feature matrix

What each platform states it does

Each row records what the vendor publishes on its own site. A blank means not verified, never assumed absent.

Absorb LMS and Degreed compared on stated capability

Capability Absorb LMS Degreed
Core LMS: courses, compliance, certification ✓ Not verified
LXP: discovery, pathways, social learning ✓ ✓
Reports capability gained, not completions ✓ ✓
Frontline and deskless, mobile first ✓ Not verified
Authoring inside the platform ✓ Not verified
Deep configuration Not verified Not verified
Partner and customer academies ✓ Not verified
Third-party content marketplace ✓ Not verified
Compliance and audit depth ✓ Not verified
Integrations ✓ Not verified
Publishes a weeks-to-live figure Not verified Not verified
Full talent suite Not verified Not verified
Compare with Disprz Compare with Disprz

Swipe sideways to see both columns.

Deep dive

Where the two actually differ

Three areas that decide most shortlists.

Scope of the contract

Absorb LMS

Absorb LMS states 9 of the 12 capabilities compared here, including authoring inside the platform.

Degreed

Degreed states 2 of the 12 capabilities compared here, including lxp: discovery, pathways, social learning.

Disprz

Disprz states 7 of the 12 capabilities compared here, including authoring inside the platform.

Evidence base

Absorb LMS

4.6 out of 5 across 1,670 reviews on the verified sites.

Degreed

4.4 out of 5 across 100 reviews on the verified sites.

Disprz

4.7 out of 5 across 238 reviews on the verified sites.

What reviewers complain about

Absorb LMS

Limited Features (77), Limited Customization (71), Missing Features (46), Learning Curve (40)

Degreed

No criticism tags were captured for this vendor.

Disprz

Navigation Difficulties (2), Limited Search Functionality (1), Integration Issues (1), Inadequate Search Functionality (1)

What reviewers say

Ratings and reviewer sentiment

Scores and tag counts were read from each vendor profile by hand and screenshotted on 15 September 2026.

Absorb LMS
G2 4.6 (976)
Capterra 4.6 (360)
Gartner Peer Insights 4.6 (334)
Praised for: Ease of Use (193), Customer Support (153), Helpful (116), Features (112), Excellent Support (104). Criticised for: Limited Features (77), Limited Customization (71), Missing Features (46), Learning Curve (40), Inadequate Reporting (38). Some users note that the reporting features could be more intuitive and comprehensive.

Read the profiles G2 Capterra Gartner Peer Insights

Compare with Disprz
Degreed
G2 4.3 (42)
Capterra 4.5 (24)
Gartner Peer Insights 4.4 (34)
Praised for: Implementation Ease (1), Helpful Resources (1), Helpful (1), Engagement (1), Easy Setup (1). Some users note that the search functionality could be improved to enhance content discovery.

Read the profiles G2 Capterra Gartner Peer Insights

Compare with Disprz
Disprz
G2 4.4 (94)
Capterra 4.7 (138)
Gartner Peer Insights 4.9 (6)
Ease of use (Capterra) 4.7
Customer service (Capterra) 4.6
Praised for: E-Learning (3), Ease of Use (3), Sharing (2), Modules (2), Certifications (1). Criticised for: Navigation Difficulties (2), Limited Search Functionality (1), Integration Issues (1), Inadequate Search Functionality (1), Expensive (1). Integration with external tools can be complex.

Read the profiles G2 Capterra Gartner Peer Insights

Book a Disprz demo

Decision table

If this is your situation, pick this

Read across the row.

If this is you Pick Why
Core LMS: courses, compliance, certification Absorb LMS Absorb LMS states it; Degreed's site does not.
Frontline and deskless, mobile first by design Absorb LMS Absorb LMS states it; Degreed's site does not.
Built-in authoring Absorb LMS Absorb LMS states it; Degreed's site does not.
Extended enterprise: partner and customer academies Absorb LMS Absorb LMS states it; Degreed's site does not.
Large third-party content marketplace Absorb LMS Absorb LMS states it; Degreed's site does not.
Multi-region regulated compliance depth Absorb LMS Absorb LMS states it; Degreed's site does not.
HRIS, SSO and API integration Absorb LMS Absorb LMS states it; Degreed's site does not.
Depth of admin configurability Neither Neither states this on their own site, so this is the wrong shortlist for it.

Both fall short

What neither one does

Neither Absorb LMS nor Degreed states 2 of the capabilities compared, including Depth of admin configurability, Recruiting, performance and succession in one contract. Neither replaces your HRIS or payroll. If the brief is one system for the whole employee lifecycle, both are the wrong shortlist and a suite vendor is the right one.
Neither Deep configuration
Neither Publishes a weeks-to-live figure
Neither Full talent suite

Capability rows record published claims, not test results.

Verdict

So which one should you buy?

Absorb LMS is a polished enterprise learning management system (LMS), while Degreed is a learning experience platform (LXP) built around skills. Three honest outcomes below, including the one where neither is right.

Go Absorb LMS
Their own site states Core LMS: courses, compliance, certification; Frontline and deskless, mobile first by design; Built-in authoring.
Compare with Disprz
Go Degreed
If Degreed's published material matches your brief more closely, take Degreed.
Compare with Disprz
Go Disprz
You are measured on capability built rather than courses completed, your frontline teams keep stalling, and you need to be live inside one quarter.
Book a Disprz demo

FAQ

Absorb LMS vs Degreed, common questions

Is Absorb LMS or Degreed better?
Neither in general. Absorb LMS for Core LMS: courses, compliance, certification, Frontline and deskless, mobile first by design. Their published claims overlap closely, so decide on price and rollout.
Which has better reviews, Absorb LMS or Degreed?
On the 3 shared sites: G2 4.6 (976 reviews) against 4.3 (42 reviews); Capterra 4.6 (360 reviews) against 4.5 (24 reviews); Gartner Peer Insights 4.6 (334 ratings) against 4.4 (34 ratings). Absorb LMS rates higher on 3 of 3. Absorb LMS carries roughly 17x the sample (1,670 against 100), so read the scores next to the counts.
How much do Absorb LMS and Degreed cost?
Neither publishes list pricing. Both are quoted on headcount, modules and region, so ask each for a three-year total including content and services.
How long does implementation take with Absorb LMS or Degreed?
Absorb LMS publishes no go-live figure. Degreed publishes no go-live figure.
What does Degreed do that Absorb LMS does not?
On the capabilities compared, nothing that Degreed publishes and Absorb LMS does not.
Who publishes this Absorb LMS vs Degreed comparison?
This page is published by Disprz, which competes with both Absorb LMS and Degreed. Disprz is deliberately excluded from the capability table so it cannot tilt the comparison, and appears only where it is labelled. Ratings are read from each vendor's own profile and dated.

Transparency

How this comparison was built

A fixed method, applied identically to all 19 platforms in this set.

12 Capability claims per vendor Recorded only where the vendor states it on their own site. A blank means not verified, never assumed absent.
3 Independent review sites G2, Capterra and Gartner Peer Insights, each read on the vendor's own profile and screenshotted.
67 Screenshots held as evidence Every published rating traces to one of them. Each figure was read by a person on the vendor's own profile and captured on the date shown.
1 Named owner One person is accountable for every figure on this page, recorded against the vendor row.

A rating is printed only where a screenshot exists

Score, count, what the count measures, the profile name, the profile URL and the date read. Missing any of them and the figure stays off the page.

Unevidenced figures are suppressed, not estimated

Where a rating cannot be evidenced the cell reads "No verifiable count identified" rather than showing a number we cannot stand behind.

A wrong-product listing is discarded

Two listings in this set matched a different product entirely. Both were quarantined rather than published.

Capability rows record claims, not tests

Each row reflects what the vendor publishes about itself. It is not a verdict on how well the capability works.

Vendor figures are attributed to the vendor

Any performance number published by a vendor rather than independently verified is named as theirs in the text.

Facts live on the vendor, not the page

One correction to a vendor row fixes every page that references it, so the set cannot drift apart.

Every source used on this page

PlatformSourceUsed for Exact page readRead on
Absorb LMS G2 Rating and review count Absorb LMS 15 Sep 2026
Absorb LMS Capterra Rating and review count Absorb LMS 15 Sep 2026
Absorb LMS Gartner Peer Insights Rating and review count Absorb LMS 15 Sep 2026
Degreed G2 Rating and review count Degreed 15 Sep 2026
Degreed Capterra Rating and review count Degreed 15 Sep 2026
Degreed Gartner Peer Insights Rating and review count Degreed 15 Sep 2026
Disprz G2 Rating and review count Disprz 15 Sep 2026
Disprz Capterra Rating and review count Disprz 15 Sep 2026
Disprz Gartner Peer Insights Rating and review count Disprz 15 Sep 2026

Why Disprz cannot tip this page

Disprz publishes this page and does not get a vote in what it says about Absorb LMS or Degreed. A rating is copied from that vendor's own profile and stored with the URL and the date, so any reader can open it and check.
  • The method was fixed before any vendor was read, so no row was chosen after seeing who it favoured.
  • Every third-party figure carries a screenshot, a profile URL and a read date.
  • Where a figure could not be evidenced it is suppressed, including for Disprz itself.
  • Disprz is not one of the two platforms compared here and is excluded from the capability table, though its own verified ratings are shown alongside for reference.
Spotted something wrong? It is fixed at source on the vendor record, which republishes every page that used the figure. Tell us what to correct.

Still deciding?

Tell us your headcount, your industry and the systems you already run, and we will map this comparison to your shortlist.

Book a Disprz demo