Data reviewed 2026-09-15 ·8 sources ·How we compared these
Large and very large enterprise (1,000+). Large regulated enterprises across sectors
Quote only no public list price
Mid-market to enterprise (200 to 5,000). Tech, professional services and fast-growing teams
Per registered user see pricing section
Positioning not verified from the vendor site.
Quote only no public list price
Key takeaways
Which one fits
Every outcome below is also written out in text underneath, so nothing here is hidden behind the picker.
Best fit
who you are training is Partners and customers
Neither, on this one Both Cornerstone and 360Learning state partner and customer academies, so this one comes down to how many audiences and how separate they must be.
who you are training is Frontline and deskless
Neither, on this one Both state frontline and deskless delivery, so judge it on the mobile experience in a demo rather than the claim.
who you are training is All of the above
Cornerstone Cornerstone states full talent suite on its own site and 360Learning does not.
what is not working today is Completions, but no capability
360Learning 360Learning states reports capability gained, not completions on its own site and Cornerstone does not.
what is not working today is Cost and add-on creep
360Learning 360Learning publishes at least part of its pricing and Cornerstone does not, so you can sanity check one quote and not the other.
what is not working today is Admin burden on a small team
Neither, on this one Neither has a decisive ease-of-use advantage in the verified scores, so judge admin burden on a hands-on trial with your own team.
live by is This quarter
Neither, on this one Neither publishes a weeks-to-live figure, so treat any quarter-length promise as something to get in writing before you sign.
in general
360Learning Across the verified sites 360Learning averages 4.6 against 4.2 for Cornerstone. Read it with the sample sizes: 923 reviews against 1,278.
Pricing
Neither of these is a rate card. It is how the quote is built.
Read from the Cornerstone public pricing and product pages, September 2026.
Custom enterprise quote (No, quote only); Guided demo
Read from the 360Learning public pricing and product pages, September 2026.
Per registered user (Partly, entry plan published); Free trial
Read from the Disprz public pricing and product pages, September 2026.
No pricing model was verified from the vendor site.
Feature matrix
Each row records what the vendor publishes on its own site. A blank means not verified, never assumed absent.
Cornerstone and 360Learning compared on stated capability
| Capability | Cornerstone | 360Learning |
|---|---|---|
| Core LMS: courses, compliance, certification | Not verified | ✓ |
| LXP: discovery, pathways, social learning | Not verified | ✓ |
| Reports capability gained, not completions | Not verified | ✓ |
| Frontline and deskless, mobile first | ✓ | ✓ |
| Authoring inside the platform | Not verified | ✓ |
| Deep configuration | Not verified | Not verified |
| Partner and customer academies | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third-party content marketplace | Not verified | ✓ |
| Compliance and audit depth | Not verified | ✓ |
| Integrations | Not verified | ✓ |
| Publishes a weeks-to-live figure | Not verified | Not verified |
| Full talent suite | ✓ | Not verified |
| Compare with Disprz | Compare with Disprz |
Swipe sideways to see both columns.
Deep dive
Three areas that decide most shortlists.
Cornerstone
Cornerstone states 3 of the 12 capabilities compared here, including partner and customer academies.
360Learning
360Learning states 9 of the 12 capabilities compared here, including authoring inside the platform.
Disprz
Disprz states 7 of the 12 capabilities compared here, including authoring inside the platform.
Cornerstone
4.2 out of 5 across 923 reviews on the verified sites.
360Learning
4.6 out of 5 across 1,278 reviews on the verified sites.
Disprz
4.7 out of 5 across 238 reviews on the verified sites.
Cornerstone
Poor Reporting (3), Inadequate Reporting (3), Limited Customization (2), Learning Curve (2)
360Learning
Limited Features (43), Learning Curve (41), Limited Customization (38), Missing Features (32)
Disprz
Navigation Difficulties (2), Limited Search Functionality (1), Integration Issues (1), Inadequate Search Functionality (1)
What reviewers say
Scores and tag counts were read from each vendor profile by hand and screenshotted on 15 September 2026.
Read the profiles G2 · Gartner Peer Insights
Compare with DisprzRead the profiles G2 · Capterra · Gartner Peer Insights
Compare with DisprzRead the profiles G2 · Capterra · Gartner Peer Insights
Book a Disprz demoDecision table
Read across the row.
| If this is you | Pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Core LMS: courses, compliance, certification | 360Learning | 360Learning states it; Cornerstone's site does not. |
| LXP: discovery, pathways, social learning | 360Learning | 360Learning states it; Cornerstone's site does not. |
| Reports on capability gained, not completions | 360Learning | 360Learning states it; Cornerstone's site does not. |
| Built-in authoring | 360Learning | 360Learning states it; Cornerstone's site does not. |
| Large third-party content marketplace | 360Learning | 360Learning states it; Cornerstone's site does not. |
| Multi-region regulated compliance depth | 360Learning | 360Learning states it; Cornerstone's site does not. |
| HRIS, SSO and API integration | 360Learning | 360Learning states it; Cornerstone's site does not. |
| Recruiting, performance and succession in one contract | Cornerstone | Cornerstone states it; 360Learning's site does not. |
Both fall short
Capability rows record published claims, not test results.
Verdict
Cornerstone is a full enterprise talent suite, while 360Learning is a collaborative learning platform built around peer authoring. Three honest outcomes below, including the one where neither is right.
FAQ
Transparency
A fixed method, applied identically to all 19 platforms in this set.
Score, count, what the count measures, the profile name, the profile URL and the date read. Missing any of them and the figure stays off the page.
Where a rating cannot be evidenced the cell reads "No verifiable count identified" rather than showing a number we cannot stand behind.
Two listings in this set matched a different product entirely. Both were quarantined rather than published.
Each row reflects what the vendor publishes about itself. It is not a verdict on how well the capability works.
Any performance number published by a vendor rather than independently verified is named as theirs in the text.
One correction to a vendor row fixes every page that references it, so the set cannot drift apart.
| Platform | Source | Used for | Exact page read | Read on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cornerstone | G2 | Rating and review count | Cornerstone | 15 Sep 2026 |
| Cornerstone | Gartner Peer Insights | Rating and review count | Cornerstone | 15 Sep 2026 |
| 360Learning | G2 | Rating and review count | 360Learning | 15 Sep 2026 |
| 360Learning | Capterra | Rating and review count | 360Learning | 15 Sep 2026 |
| 360Learning | Gartner Peer Insights | Rating and review count | 360Learning | 15 Sep 2026 |
| Disprz | G2 | Rating and review count | Disprz | 15 Sep 2026 |
| Disprz | Capterra | Rating and review count | Disprz | 15 Sep 2026 |
| Disprz | Gartner Peer Insights | Rating and review count | Disprz | 15 Sep 2026 |
Keep researching
Every pairing in this set is built from the same sources on the same date.
Tell us your headcount, your industry and the systems you already run, and we will map this comparison to your shortlist.