Latest L&D Playbook: The 2026 AI Buyer's Guide for HR and L&D Leaders Download Now

Enthral vs Paradiso LMS

Enthral is built around joining learning, skills and talent in one place, whereas Paradiso LMS is built around configurability across many integrations. Compared below on published capability, verified ratings and pricing structure. Disprz publishes this page and is left out of the capability table below.

Data reviewed 2026-09-15 8 sources How we compared these

Enthral
4.5 Capterra, 10 reviews

Positioning not verified from the vendor site.

Quote only no public list price

Paradiso LMS
4.1 G2, 13 reviews

Positioning not verified from the vendor site.

Quote only no public list price

Disprz
4.7 Capterra, 138 reviews

Positioning not verified from the vendor site.

Quote only no public list price

Key takeaways

Enthral vs Paradiso LMS in five lines

  • Ratings
    On the 2 shared sites: G2 4.5 (5 reviews) against 4.1 (13 reviews); Capterra 4.5 (10 reviews) against 4.2 (10 reviews). Enthral rates higher on 2 of 2. Sample sizes are broadly comparable.
  • Shape
    Both state 9 of the 12 capabilities compared. Enthral states 1 that Paradiso LMS does not: Full talent suite. Paradiso LMS states 1 that Enthral does not: Deep configuration.
  • Pricing
    Neither publishes list pricing. Both are quoted on headcount, modules and region, so ask each for a three-year total including content and services.
  • Rollout
    Enthral publishes no go-live figure. Paradiso LMS publishes no go-live figure.
  • The gap
    Neither states 1 of the capabilities compared, including Publishes a weeks-to-live figure.

Which one fits

Pick your situation, get the honest answer

Every outcome below is also written out in text underneath, so nothing here is hidden behind the picker.

What is not working today
Who you are training
Live by

Best fit

Every outcome is written out below, so nothing is hidden behind the picker.

who you are training is Partners and customers

Neither, on this one Both Enthral and Paradiso LMS state partner and customer academies, so this one comes down to how many audiences and how separate they must be.

who you are training is Frontline and deskless

Neither, on this one Both state frontline and deskless delivery, so judge it on the mobile experience in a demo rather than the claim.

who you are training is All of the above

Enthral Enthral states full talent suite on its own site and Paradiso LMS does not.

what is not working today is Completions, but no capability

Neither, on this one Both state capability reporting rather than completions, so ask each to show the same skill gap report on your own roles.

what is not working today is Cost and add-on creep

Neither, on this one Neither publishes a list price. Both are quoted on headcount and modules, so compare three-year totals including services rather than licence lines.

what is not working today is Admin burden on a small team

Neither, on this one Neither has a decisive ease-of-use advantage in the verified scores, so judge admin burden on a hands-on trial with your own team.

live by is This quarter

Neither, on this one Neither publishes a weeks-to-live figure, so treat any quarter-length promise as something to get in writing before you sign.

in general

Enthral Across the verified sites Enthral averages 4.7 against 4.2 for Paradiso LMS. Read it with the sample sizes: 16 reviews against 23.

Pricing

What each one costs, and what moves the number

Neither of these is a rate card. It is how the quote is built.

Enthral

Read from the Enthral public pricing and product pages, September 2026.

Quoted On request
Priced on headcount and modules

No pricing model was verified from the vendor site.

No public list price, so the only way to compare is to ask for a three-year total.
Paradiso LMS

Read from the Paradiso LMS public pricing and product pages, September 2026.

Quoted On request
Priced on headcount and modules

No pricing model was verified from the vendor site.

No public list price, so the only way to compare is to ask for a three-year total.
Disprz

Read from the Disprz public pricing and product pages, September 2026.

Quoted On request
Priced on headcount and modules

No pricing model was verified from the vendor site.

No public list price, so the only way to compare is to ask for a three-year total.
Ask all of them the same three questions: the three-year total including content and services, what becomes a separate line item later, and what happens to the price when headcount moves.

Feature matrix

What each platform states it does

Each row records what the vendor publishes on its own site. A blank means not verified, never assumed absent.

Enthral and Paradiso LMS compared on stated capability

Capability Enthral Paradiso LMS
Core LMS: courses, compliance, certification
LXP: discovery, pathways, social learning
Reports capability gained, not completions
Frontline and deskless, mobile first
Authoring inside the platform
Deep configuration Not verified
Partner and customer academies
Third-party content marketplace
Compliance and audit depth
Integrations
Publishes a weeks-to-live figure Not verified Not verified
Full talent suite Not verified
Compare with Disprz Compare with Disprz

Swipe sideways to see both columns.

Deep dive

Where the two actually differ

Three areas that decide most shortlists.

Scope of the contract

Enthral

Enthral states 10 of the 12 capabilities compared here, including authoring inside the platform.

Paradiso LMS

Paradiso LMS states 10 of the 12 capabilities compared here, including authoring inside the platform.

Disprz

Disprz states 7 of the 12 capabilities compared here, including authoring inside the platform.

Evidence base

Enthral

4.7 out of 5 across 16 reviews on the verified sites.

Paradiso LMS

4.2 out of 5 across 23 reviews on the verified sites.

Disprz

4.7 out of 5 across 238 reviews on the verified sites.

What reviewers complain about

Enthral

No criticism tags were captured for this vendor.

Paradiso LMS

No criticism tags were captured for this vendor.

Disprz

Navigation Difficulties (2), Limited Search Functionality (1), Integration Issues (1), Inadequate Search Functionality (1)

What reviewers say

Ratings and reviewer sentiment

Scores and tag counts were read from each vendor profile by hand and screenshotted on 15 September 2026.

Enthral
G2 4.5 (5)
Capterra 4.5 (10)
Gartner Peer Insights 5.0 (1)
Ease of use (Capterra) 4.7
Customer service (Capterra) 4.6
No pros and cons panel was captured for this vendor.
Compare with Disprz
Paradiso LMS
G2 4.1 (13)
Capterra 4.2 (10)
Gartner Peer Insights No verifiable count identified
No pros and cons panel was captured for this vendor. Site can be slow and navigation may sometimes hinder engagement.
Compare with Disprz
Disprz
G2 4.4 (94)
Capterra 4.7 (138)
Gartner Peer Insights 4.9 (6)
Ease of use (Capterra) 4.7
Customer service (Capterra) 4.6
Praised for: E-Learning (3), Ease of Use (3), Sharing (2), Modules (2), Certifications (1). Criticised for: Navigation Difficulties (2), Limited Search Functionality (1), Integration Issues (1), Inadequate Search Functionality (1), Expensive (1). Integration with external tools can be complex.
Book a Disprz demo

Decision table

If this is your situation, pick this

Read across the row.

If this is you Pick Why
Depth of admin configurability Paradiso LMS Paradiso LMS states it; Enthral's site does not.
Recruiting, performance and succession in one contract Enthral Enthral states it; Paradiso LMS's site does not.

Both fall short

What neither one does

Neither Enthral nor Paradiso LMS states 0 of the capabilities compared. Neither replaces your HRIS or payroll. If the brief is one system for the whole employee lifecycle, both are the wrong shortlist and a suite vendor is the right one.
Neither Publishes a weeks-to-live figure

Capability rows record published claims, not test results.

Verdict

So which one should you buy?

Enthral is a unified skilling platform combining LMS, LXP and talent, while Paradiso LMS is a configurable learning management system (LMS). Three honest outcomes below, including the one where neither is right.

Go Enthral
Their own site states Recruiting, performance and succession in one contract.
Compare with Disprz
Go Paradiso LMS
Their own site states Depth of admin configurability.
Compare with Disprz
Go Disprz
You are measured on capability built rather than courses completed, your frontline teams keep stalling, and you need to be live inside one quarter.
Book a Disprz demo

FAQ

Enthral vs Paradiso LMS, common questions

Is Enthral or Paradiso LMS better?
Neither in general. Enthral for Recruiting, performance and succession in one contract. Paradiso LMS for Depth of admin configurability.
Which has better reviews, Enthral or Paradiso LMS?
On the 2 shared sites: G2 4.5 (5 reviews) against 4.1 (13 reviews); Capterra 4.5 (10 reviews) against 4.2 (10 reviews). Enthral rates higher on 2 of 2. Sample sizes are broadly comparable.
How much do Enthral and Paradiso LMS cost?
Neither publishes list pricing. Both are quoted on headcount, modules and region, so ask each for a three-year total including content and services.
How long does implementation take with Enthral or Paradiso LMS?
Enthral publishes no go-live figure. Paradiso LMS publishes no go-live figure.
What does Paradiso LMS do that Enthral does not?
Their site states: Depth of admin configurability.
Who publishes this Enthral vs Paradiso LMS comparison?
This page is published by Disprz, which competes with both Enthral and Paradiso LMS. Disprz is deliberately excluded from the capability table so it cannot tilt the comparison, and appears only where it is labelled. Ratings are read from each vendor's own profile and dated.

Transparency

How this comparison was built

A fixed method, applied identically to all 19 platforms in this set.

12 Capability claims per vendor Recorded only where the vendor states it on their own site. A blank means not verified, never assumed absent.
3 Independent review sites G2, Capterra and Gartner Peer Insights, each read on the vendor's own profile and screenshotted.
67 Screenshots held as evidence Every published rating traces to one of them. Each figure was read by a person on the vendor's own profile and captured on the date shown.
1 Named owner One person is accountable for every figure on this page, recorded against the vendor row.

A rating is printed only where a screenshot exists

Score, count, what the count measures, the profile name, the profile URL and the date read. Missing any of them and the figure stays off the page.

Unevidenced figures are suppressed, not estimated

Where a rating cannot be evidenced the cell reads "No verifiable count identified" rather than showing a number we cannot stand behind.

A wrong-product listing is discarded

Two listings in this set matched a different product entirely. Both were quarantined rather than published.

Capability rows record claims, not tests

Each row reflects what the vendor publishes about itself. It is not a verdict on how well the capability works.

Vendor figures are attributed to the vendor

Any performance number published by a vendor rather than independently verified is named as theirs in the text.

Facts live on the vendor, not the page

One correction to a vendor row fixes every page that references it, so the set cannot drift apart.

Every source used on this page

PlatformSourceUsed for Exact page readRead on
Enthral G2 Rating and review count Enthral 15 Sep 2026
Enthral Capterra Rating and review count Enthral 15 Sep 2026
Enthral Gartner Peer Insights Rating and review count Enthral LXP 15 Sep 2026
Paradiso LMS G2 Rating and review count Paradiso LMS 15 Sep 2026
Paradiso LMS Capterra Rating and review count Paradiso LMS 15 Sep 2026
Disprz G2 Rating and review count Disprz 15 Sep 2026
Disprz Capterra Rating and review count Disprz 15 Sep 2026
Disprz Gartner Peer Insights Rating and review count Disprz 15 Sep 2026

Why Disprz cannot tip this page

Disprz publishes this page and does not get a vote in what it says about Enthral or Paradiso LMS. A rating is copied from that vendor's own profile and stored with the URL and the date, so any reader can open it and check.
  • The method was fixed before any vendor was read, so no row was chosen after seeing who it favoured.
  • Every third-party figure carries a screenshot, a profile URL and a read date.
  • Where a figure could not be evidenced it is suppressed, including for Disprz itself.
  • Disprz is not one of the two platforms compared here and is excluded from the capability table, though its own verified ratings are shown alongside for reference.
Spotted something wrong? It is fixed at source on the vendor record, which republishes every page that used the figure. Tell us what to correct.

Still deciding?

Tell us your headcount, your industry and the systems you already run, and we will map this comparison to your shortlist.