Data reviewed 2026-09-15 ·8 sources ·How we compared these
Positioning not verified from the vendor site.
Quote only no public list price
Any size with in-house IT; common in large and public sector. Education, government and technical enterprises
Partner hosting and support; open-source see pricing section
Positioning not verified from the vendor site.
Quote only no public list price
Key takeaways
Which one fits
Every outcome below is also written out in text underneath, so nothing here is hidden behind the picker.
Best fit
who you are training is Partners and customers
SAP SuccessFactors SAP SuccessFactors states partner and customer academies on its own site and Moodle does not.
who you are training is Frontline and deskless
Neither, on this one Neither states a frontline-first design. This is the gap that sends most deskless programmes back to the shortlist.
who you are training is All of the above
SAP SuccessFactors SAP SuccessFactors states full talent suite on its own site and Moodle does not.
what is not working today is Completions, but no capability
SAP SuccessFactors SAP SuccessFactors states reports capability gained, not completions on its own site and Moodle does not.
what is not working today is Cost and add-on creep
Moodle Moodle publishes at least part of its pricing and SAP SuccessFactors does not, so you can sanity check one quote and not the other.
what is not working today is Admin burden on a small team
Neither, on this one Neither has a decisive ease-of-use advantage in the verified scores, so judge admin burden on a hands-on trial with your own team.
live by is This quarter
Neither, on this one Neither publishes a weeks-to-live figure, so treat any quarter-length promise as something to get in writing before you sign.
in general
Neither, on this one The two sit within a rounding error of each other on the verified sites, so the ratings will not decide this. The situational rows above will.
Pricing
Neither of these is a rate card. It is how the quote is built.
Read from the SAP SuccessFactors public pricing and product pages, September 2026.
No pricing model was verified from the vendor site.
Read from the Moodle public pricing and product pages, September 2026.
Partner hosting and support; open-source core is free to self-host (Varies by partner); Free to self-host
Read from the Disprz public pricing and product pages, September 2026.
No pricing model was verified from the vendor site.
Feature matrix
Each row records what the vendor publishes on its own site. A blank means not verified, never assumed absent.
SAP SuccessFactors and Moodle compared on stated capability
| Capability | SAP SuccessFactors | Moodle |
|---|---|---|
| Core LMS: courses, compliance, certification | ✓ | ✓ |
| LXP: discovery, pathways, social learning | Not verified | ✓ |
| Reports capability gained, not completions | ✓ | Not verified |
| Frontline and deskless, mobile first | Not verified | Not verified |
| Authoring inside the platform | Not verified | ✓ |
| Deep configuration | Not verified | ✓ |
| Partner and customer academies | ✓ | Not verified |
| Third-party content marketplace | Not verified | Not verified |
| Compliance and audit depth | ✓ | Not verified |
| Integrations | ✓ | Not verified |
| Publishes a weeks-to-live figure | Not verified | Not verified |
| Full talent suite | ✓ | Not verified |
| Compare with Disprz | Compare with Disprz |
Swipe sideways to see both columns.
Deep dive
Three areas that decide most shortlists.
SAP SuccessFactors
SAP SuccessFactors states 6 of the 12 capabilities compared here, including compliance and audit depth.
Moodle
Moodle states 4 of the 12 capabilities compared here, including authoring inside the platform.
Disprz
Disprz states 7 of the 12 capabilities compared here, including authoring inside the platform.
SAP SuccessFactors
4.2 out of 5 across 1,917 reviews on the verified sites.
Moodle
4.2 out of 5 across 3,944 reviews on the verified sites.
Disprz
4.7 out of 5 across 238 reviews on the verified sites.
SAP SuccessFactors
Limited Customization (83), Not User-Friendly (80), Not Intuitive (76), Learning Curve (74)
Moodle
Not User-Friendly (9), Limited Features (7), Lack of Intuitiveness (7), User Interface (6)
Disprz
Navigation Difficulties (2), Limited Search Functionality (1), Integration Issues (1), Inadequate Search Functionality (1)
What reviewers say
Scores and tag counts were read from each vendor profile by hand and screenshotted on 15 September 2026.
Read the profiles G2 · Gartner Peer Insights
Compare with DisprzRead the profiles G2 · Capterra · Gartner Peer Insights
Compare with DisprzRead the profiles G2 · Capterra · Gartner Peer Insights
Book a Disprz demoDecision table
Read across the row.
| If this is you | Pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| LXP: discovery, pathways, social learning | Moodle | Moodle states it; SAP SuccessFactors's site does not. |
| Reports on capability gained, not completions | SAP SuccessFactors | SAP SuccessFactors states it; Moodle's site does not. |
| Built-in authoring | Moodle | Moodle states it; SAP SuccessFactors's site does not. |
| Depth of admin configurability | Moodle | Moodle states it; SAP SuccessFactors's site does not. |
| Extended enterprise: partner and customer academies | SAP SuccessFactors | SAP SuccessFactors states it; Moodle's site does not. |
| Multi-region regulated compliance depth | SAP SuccessFactors | SAP SuccessFactors states it; Moodle's site does not. |
| HRIS, SSO and API integration | SAP SuccessFactors | SAP SuccessFactors states it; Moodle's site does not. |
| Recruiting, performance and succession in one contract | SAP SuccessFactors | SAP SuccessFactors states it; Moodle's site does not. |
Both fall short
Capability rows record published claims, not test results.
Verdict
SAP SuccessFactors is an enterprise HR suite with learning inside it, while Moodle is a free, open-source learning management system (LMS). Three honest outcomes below, including the one where neither is right.
FAQ
Transparency
A fixed method, applied identically to all 19 platforms in this set.
Score, count, what the count measures, the profile name, the profile URL and the date read. Missing any of them and the figure stays off the page.
Where a rating cannot be evidenced the cell reads "No verifiable count identified" rather than showing a number we cannot stand behind.
Two listings in this set matched a different product entirely. Both were quarantined rather than published.
Each row reflects what the vendor publishes about itself. It is not a verdict on how well the capability works.
Any performance number published by a vendor rather than independently verified is named as theirs in the text.
One correction to a vendor row fixes every page that references it, so the set cannot drift apart.
| Platform | Source | Used for | Exact page read | Read on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP SuccessFactors | G2 | Rating and review count | SAP SuccessFactors | 15 Sep 2026 |
| SAP SuccessFactors | Gartner Peer Insights | Rating and review count | SAP SuccessFactors | 15 Sep 2026 |
| Moodle | G2 | Rating and review count | Moodle | 15 Sep 2026 |
| Moodle | Capterra | Rating and review count | Moodle | 15 Sep 2026 |
| Moodle | Gartner Peer Insights | Rating and review count | Moodle | 15 Sep 2026 |
| Disprz | G2 | Rating and review count | Disprz | 15 Sep 2026 |
| Disprz | Capterra | Rating and review count | Disprz | 15 Sep 2026 |
| Disprz | Gartner Peer Insights | Rating and review count | Disprz | 15 Sep 2026 |
Keep researching
Every pairing in this set is built from the same sources on the same date.
Tell us your headcount, your industry and the systems you already run, and we will map this comparison to your shortlist.